Did Jesus only die for the sins of those who believe in him, or for the sins of everyone?
I've recently finished reading "Life by His Death", which is a simplified version of John Owen's classic The Death of Death in the Death of Christ. I didn't feel the need to read a simplified version - but Amazon were out of DoDitDoC and they didn't say this version was simplified... Poor excuse, and if anyone who has read DoDitDoC says it deals with some of the criticisms of it here, I'm happy to make the effort to find a copy.
The book itself is a strong defence of the doctrine of Limited Atonement - that Christ died only for those who trust in him rather than for everyone without exception. It's a controversial doctrine, so I thought it worth writing a few thoughts about it.
Much of what Owen writes is brilliant - he argues strongly from God's sovereignty and from the fact that we require the work of the Holy Spirit to bring us to life and open our eyes before we believe that we cannot trust God unless he draws us to do so, and if he draws us to do so, we cannot resist.
It really got me thinking what it would be like to preach evangelistically trusting properly in God's sovereignty, and seeking to encourage God's work in people and preaching to those whom God is working in rather than those in whom he is not yet working...
Thus we appeal to men as if they all had the ability to receive Christ at any time; we speak of His redeeeming work as if He had done no more by dying than make it possible for us to save ourselves by believing; we speak of God's love as if it were no more than a general willingness to receive any who will turn and trust; and we depict the Father and the Son, not as sovereignly active in drawing sinners to themselves, but as waiting in quiet impotence 'at the door of our hearts' for us to let them in. It is undeniable that this is how we preach; perhaps this is what we really believe. But it needs to be said with some emphasis that this set of twisted half-truths is something other than the biblical gospel.
J.I. Packer, Introduction
The weaknesses in Owen's arugments are twofold. Firstly, he comes to a theological position based on some texts, and then interprets others in the light of his theology. One of his most common arguments is "this text does not mean A, because we already know ~A". Hence many of his arguments would only work on those who already hold to the authority and consistency of Scripture. At the same time, his arguments could be (and have been) reversed. People could argue from the verses that seem to teach ~A that it is true, and then use exactly the same tactics on the verses that seem to teach A. I think they'd come unstuck though, because their conception of God would not really be sovereign, but that doesn't change the problem with using it as an arguing technique.
The second problem is that Owen almost always looks at things from a God's-eye view. And actually, I agree with Owen. From God's point of view, when Jesus died, God knew and had chosen those who were going to trust in him, and Jesus died only for their sins. From God's point of view, Jesus did not die for those who would not trust in him.
But from our point of view, things are very different. There's only one point in the book where Owen's view changes to ours.
Preachers can never know who, in their congregations, are God's elect. They must therefore call on all to believe, and promise that as many as do will be saved, for there is enough in the death of Christ to save all who believe.
Life by His Death, p.52
Most people don't function with a God's eye view. Most people find conceptual arguments difficult to follow, and Owen employs little else. I'm heavily conceptual, and I found it difficult that when he kept mentioning the many people who hadn't heard of Jesus, he never once used it as a motivation to tell them!
I think that at the end of the day, Owen is right about Jesus' death. I don't know if in 1647 there were people who believed in the full authority and consistency of Scripture, were comfortable with highly conceptual arguments and believed that Jesus died to actually forgive the sins of all rather than just those who believe. If there were, maybe this book is the reason there are so few such people now. But that's clearly who the book is aimed at.
But it is critically important that we hold that belief in tension with human responsibility and the fact that the gospel is held out to all, because Jesus died for anyone who will put their trust in him.
I've thought about this. And truthfully, sometimes, it makes me angry. I think, okay; this is God's gig. He made the rules. He allows Satan. None of us asked to be born in sin. None of us asked to be less than perfect. So, yes, we have Christ. But look how Satan has fought to keep Christ a lie or a myth or a very nice fable. What about the people who are born into a non-Christian culture? How much hope is there actually for them? Why is it harder for some cultures to find Christ while others are born into Christian cultures? And if it is a Christian's responsibility to bring others to Christ, who is going to pay for our failure to do so? Look at all of the different belief systems out there. How can anyone possibly know which one is "real"? Satan has been at this a lot longer than we have. Why doesn't God come down and walk among us so there can be no doubt? On the surface, it just doesn't seem fair. God Himself says that He doesn't want one to be lost and yet.....it looks like millions will be. The only way that I could reconcile this was to remember when Christ said, "In my Father's house, there are many rooms". So perhaps, those that believe in God, like Native Americans won't go to "heaven" but perhaps there is a room just for them in my Father's house. I don't know; I just have faith that God will work everything out perfectly.
"Why doesn't God come down and walk among us so there can be no doubt?"
Ummmmmm.... He did?
Well, I believe He did, but lets face it; in the years since then Satan has waged a very good smear campaign. We hear how the Bible has been misinterpreted. Or how inaccurate the Bible is because there is no evidence for the Exodus., etc., etc. Every day we are assaulted with the message that Jesus was NOT the Christ. In this world where sin is rampant, sometimes, I would just like a little help holding on to my faith.
Post a Comment