tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18654361.post6338476788932020814..comments2023-07-06T15:14:57.204+01:00Comments on JOHN'S BLOG: Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy 5Johnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02487495921222083129noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18654361.post-29774039711667453472007-08-16T18:20:00.000+01:002007-08-16T18:20:00.000+01:00I don't think inerrancy includes anything more tha...I don't think inerrancy includes anything more than the view that the Bible is without error in all that it affirms. And that is in Augustine. Of course, the <B>Statement</B> includes more than that.Daniel Hillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07823511443088751096noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18654361.post-35776485178192539862007-08-16T18:16:00.000+01:002007-08-16T18:16:00.000+01:00No - my argument is that the doctrine of inerrancy...No - my argument is that the doctrine of inerrancy was first articulated in its present form, including the way it incorporates so much else, by scholastic protestantism.Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02487495921222083129noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18654361.post-48172057093089568462007-08-16T15:26:00.000+01:002007-08-16T15:26:00.000+01:00'Augustine doesn't then go on and develop his idea...'Augustine doesn't then go on and develop his ideas majorly (as far as I'm aware) and make them the cornerstone of his doctrine of Scripture.'<BR/><BR/>I'm confused: is your objection then not that the doctrine of inerrancy was invented by scholastic Protestantism (which is what I thought you were saying) but that making the doctrine the cornerstone of one's doctrine of Scripture was invented by Daniel Hillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07823511443088751096noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18654361.post-49156383470382564552007-08-16T14:36:00.000+01:002007-08-16T14:36:00.000+01:00I think it is an example of the articulation of th...I think it is an example of the articulation of the underlying doctrine. Augustine doesn't then go on and develop his ideas majorly (as far as I'm aware) and make them the cornerstone of his doctrine of Scripture.Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02487495921222083129noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18654361.post-57270203261275129962007-08-16T14:19:00.000+01:002007-08-16T14:19:00.000+01:00'the articulation of it as "inerrancy" does seem t...'the articulation of it as "inerrancy" does seem to be invented by scholastic Protestantism'<BR/><BR/>Why don't you think that the following statement by Augustine in Letter 82 (Chapter 1; Section 3) to Jerome counts as a statement of inerrancy?<BR/>For I confess to your Charity that I have learned to yield this respect and honour only to the canonical books of Scripture: of these alone do I mostDaniel Hillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07823511443088751096noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18654361.post-42635142623015446542007-08-16T11:07:00.000+01:002007-08-16T11:07:00.000+01:00Nice blog! you can stop by S.A.G.E's..Nice blog! you can stop by S.A.G.E's..Lindahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05676645155729737257noreply@blogger.com